Editor assigned after minor revision. After that, it changed to 'Under Review.
Editor assigned after minor revision. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed.
after two months being in the status of editor assigned, it finally went under review about a month ago. If the editor cannot make a recommendation based on a self-check then options 2) and 3) should be considered. 为什么收到第一轮审稿意见的时候有编辑“accept after minor revision”,第二轮修改后进入pending editor decision, 第一轮的编辑意见不见了,那以前的小修后 Jan 15, 2019 · Peer review is the indispensable part of publishing a scientific paper, in particulars in high-impact journals. What does it mean? The article will be handled by new editor? Or the editor is making final decision based on our revised I sent an article and it was accepted minor revision required. Then I re-submitted the revised form. The associate editor may seek further reviews and revisions if necessary. If the article is rejected for publication, the reasons will be explained to the author. The various status updates are as follows. e. Most journals assign a manuscript number upon initial submission and send an automated notice to advise you of the number (if not now, the manuscript number will be assigned when the first editor is assigned). After getting a minor revision, a revised version of manuscript was submitted three months ago to a reputed journal. Reject. Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should Nov 16, 2015 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (minor revision). Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. メジャーリビジョン(major revision)やマイナーリビジョン(minor revision)といった特有の単語も解説しました。 学術論文が採択されるまで何をしなければいけないか知りたいですか?投稿から採択までの全ての手順を説明しました。Nature, Scienceなどに投稿するなら Sep 19, 2016 · In my experience, most referees do turn around minor revisions much faster than the original report. Both the reviewers asked for minor corrections and found the manuscript technically correct and interesting to read. If the required revision is very minor, the AE may recommend acceptance to the EIC without seeking a revision because the authors will have an opportunity for some Minor changes will usually be assessed directly by the editor; If significant revisions were requested, the editor will usually return the manuscript to the original reviewers (unless they opted out of this) Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh review is sought. Organize yourself so that you can produce a clear and comprehensive revision of the manuscript (7). Only after clearing the initial screening is the article sent to two or more independent peer reviewers . Feb 28, 2023 · I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Hence the first Editor Assigned to Under Review. Aug 12, 2024 · The academic Editor decision was as follows: Accept after minor revision. I submitted the revised manuscript after making the corrections as suggested by the reviewers. 3. The quick change from ‘Editor Assigned’ to ‘Reviewer Assigned’ means that the Associate Editor (AE) had a look at your manuscript and decided that it fits the journal scope and also My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. Thus, authors should proceed with an invitation for a minor revision with the same care as they approach an invitation for a major revision. Good luck! Related reading: After three rounds of review and revision, why is the status "with editor" again? Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Aug 11, 2024 · After the authors address the reviewer concerns, after a minor revision, the Academic Editor can still send the paper to another round of reviews due to “some” concerns. The status turned to ‘Under Review’ one week later. Now, I need to get my paper published in a month. The paper status has changed from "major revision" to "with editor" after submitting the revised paper. The paper was peer-reviewed, and we were asked to incorporate minor/major revisions from the reviewers respectively. All of the sudden the statues changed to the revised version review from yesterday. Jun 18, 2019 · The status “Editor Assigned” means that your paper was assigned to an Associate Editor (AE) who would be responsible for your manuscript till the first decision. . After the revision, the paper is sent back to the reviewers for checking the corrections and making their final decisions. But when I submitted the revised article since day 2 it's status is "editor assignment pending" for almost 2 weeks. In the case of a Revision decision, it would also include your view of essential enhancements the authors must make or any other particular issues related to the paper. Proper strategy. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. The author has 4 or 8 weeks for a revision (e. Your promptness in submitting the revision expresses your eagerness and sincerity about your work. Cite Fausto Alfredo Canales Before submitting your revision and author response letter, we strongly recommend that someone outside your immediate working group read the paper and letter for clarity, as well as grammar and typos. May 27, 2020 · After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. " This status has not been changed for a month. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. If the editor feels that your manuscript has the potential to be published, but requires changes, you’ll be invited to revise it. Jan 18, 2020 · 1 Answer to this question. The Editor will provide the reviewers with their previous reviews and the author’s letter for reference. I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. This means that the submission does not need any further work, and can be published in its current state. It happens in less than 10% of submissions. At this stage, the editor is diligently analysing the feedback, weighing the merits and shortcomings of the manuscript, and Jan 24, 2021 · I submitted my article to an Elsevier journal on August 5, 2020. ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. 2 This is an important step as Sep 16, 2021 · The revision can be minor, moderate, or major, and this is usually indicated in the decision letter and/or the manuscript status in the submission system. After resubmitting the paper the status appeared editor invited and has not changed in more than a week. The day I submitted the revised version, the status was ‘With Editor'. Editors can also be asked for input without being assigned to take charge of a review. If the editorial decision is a minor revision, it is likely that the manuscript will be accepted once the requested minor changes are done. Here the status could show "Editor assigned", or it could show "awaiting reviewer invitation". The status was "With Editor" for three weeks, then it changed to "Under review", since 2 weeks. If a revision is requested, the review process begins again when your revised manuscript is submitted; however Accept - No further revision required. In the current era, it is exceedingly rare for a manuscript to be accepted without any modifications. Rr], where YY identifies the year of submission, NNNN is a number that increments by one for each manuscript received, and [. After seven months I was asked by the editor to make major revisions. This could mean one of the following: 'reject', 'submit as new', 'major revision, 'minor revision' or 'accept' (Depending on the journal, options may change). The outcome will be Accept, Accept with Minor Revisions, or Reject. Rr] is a suffix, not present on the original submission, that identifies the revision number, i. Out of the four reviewers, the first suggested minor revision with no further re-review, the second reviewer wanted to see the manuscript in revised form, the third rejected it, and the fourth suggested publication (though he also suggested us to try for a higher impact journal). Peer review helps to maintain high standards for published research. Editor’s Decision in Progress: A change in status from ‘Required Reviews Completed’ to ‘Under Review’ may signify that the editor has successfully gathered all the necessary reviews from the assigned reviewers. The status date May 6, 2021 · Your paper is resubmitted. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. In cases minor revisions/Major revisions are recommended, the author is usually requested to revise the paper before referring to the academic editor the next round review. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. Now, more than one month has passed, but the status is still With Editor’ with a change in the date. Overall, things sound positive, and you should receive the decision soon. The AE will do an initial screening of the manuscript to check its overall scientific value and match with the scope of the paper, after which the paper will either receive a desk rejection or be sent for peer review. Even the best papers could sometimes receive a major revision or rejection after an initial minor revision request. October 25: The Editor assigned to article. " However, one of my article which was accepted with minor revision is now under "Editor Invited Nov 12, 2020 · I submitted my article earlier this year in January. Does this mean it got sent to reviewers or the editor is evaluating it? Any experience here? It’s an Elsevier journal. May 31, 2024 · Author Revision. Peer review decisions are detailed below: Accept (minor edits): The article is acceptable for publication as is. How can I politely tell the editor to speed up the process? If the article is accepted, authors are able to make minor edits to their articles based on reviewers’ comments before publication. Nov 6, 2023 · I submitted my manuscript on April 26th and I got the major revision in the first round and “accept after minor revision” in the second round. Articles may or may not be sent to reviewers after minor revision, which depends on whether the reviewer requested to see the revised version or not. You have a chance for publication and it improves if you've actually improved the paper based on all the reviewer's suggestions. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). It is rare The Editor Resources website aims to provide insights and information to support the editor’s role and build connections between editors and research communities. 何日かは 論文誌や論文によって違うので、正確な数字は言えません 。 ただここでは例として、私が典型的だと思っている私の2つの論文(Nature communicationsとSensir and actuator IFは3. Both reviewers asked me to add more literature and enhance the figures' quality. Feb 17, 2022 · However, it was under review for 5 months. This should be the option that is first considered. Editors will consider the following aspects: An editor of a minor revision can choose to evaluate the new version in one of three ways: The editor can check the paper on its own without seeking any additional reviews. An editor should not be the first outside person to read your revision. After three months I received the editor decision as The academic editor was a reputed researcher. Jul 12, 2016 · However, two months after submitting the revisions, the status of the submission is still "Editor Assigned". 5くらい)の日数をお見せします。 I am not sure if the initial revision requested was a major revision or a minor revision. Aug 1, 2020 · Your understanding is bang on, well, mostly. I spoke with Elsevier’s journal Jun 19, 2020 · I have finished the second round of revision (a minor revision). The article took 5 months and I got decision with minor revision. None of these decisions require re-review. However I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. It has been over two months, but the status is still displayed as Jan 8, 2021 · I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. The most likely scenario seems to be that the editor send your work after minor revision to the referee who was asking for it. R1 for the first revision, . Whether you are looking for information on designing an academic or scientific article, constructing a scholarly argument, targeting the right journal, following journal guidelines with precision, providing accurate and complete references, writing correct and elegant scholarly English, communicating with journal editors or revising your paper in light of that communication, you will find Aug 16, 2024 · 一审经历了两个半月,意见终于回来了。编辑要求14天内修回,要好好回复审稿人意见啦。 对了给大家update一下,just fyi,我这两个多月acs publishing center的状态一直是associate editor assigned,所以这个杂志送审应该是不更新状态的~ Jun 27, 2019 · Once the editor has accepted the invitation, the manuscript status will change to “Editor assigned. After incorporating the comments of reviewers, I resubmitted the paper. Step 6 After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly without any further edits. in Hindawi publisher. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. the employee of the publisher assigned to the journal) or the editor-in-chief assigns an editorial board member to handle the paper. Coming to your question, a month at Pending Decision is a bit long, but we have seen this happen in the post-COVID research publication scenario: revised manuscripts have reached the EIC’s desk but have been pending their decision for a month or more. Receiving this output from good journals is very rare. Jun 17, 2023 · Should I contact the editor to know about the update You may gently nudge the editor via the journal system. Mar 20, 2017 · A major revision goes back to reviewers, while the minor revision goes to the (associate) editor for a decision. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. We identify the most appropriate editor to handle your submission, selected from our 1,709-member editorial board. Either: Jul 29, 2017 · I submitted the manuscript to a Springer medical journal. Jan 2, 2019 · We submitted a revised version of our manuscript to the IGI Global IJISMD Journal. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. An editor can assign a paper to the same or different reviewers. after a 2nd revision) may not require any editorial summary. Either the desk editor (i. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. , . Feb 28, 2022 · After getting a minor revision, a revised version of manuscript was submitted three months ago to a reputed journal. Next, the associate editor (AE) will go through the peer review comments and make a decision on your paper, whether to send it you for a minor/major revision or to reject it. Oct 18, 2020 · After two months of submission, I received a decision for major revision. the Editor or Associate Editor who is handling your Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Unfortunately new referees can be invited by an editor when an old referee drops out by just not responding. During review, you will also have the option to submit PDF files to complement your review. October 25: The status changed to Under Review. The status of my paper changed to"Editor assignment pending". Anyway, all you can do is ask. The status changed to " Editor Assigned" after two days. A strategy that Jul 22, 2021 · Then, I have made all the necessary modifications and resubmitted. After submitting the revised version of my manuscript, it is showing "Editor assigned" for almost 3 months now. However, a rebuttal, rather than a revision, is less likely to be successful in most cases. However, 60 days isn't too long for a major revision. If a paper is selected for peer review, the Editor will either send the paper to suitable reviewers or assign an Associate Editor to act on their behalf. The one exception is that accepting a paper after just minor revisions (e. The status changed to Under Review on August 30. Such appeals are not always successful, but if you put forward a compelling argument to the editor why your manuscript decision should be modified to major or minor revisions (this is where your point-by-point responses to the reviewers’ comments are critical), the editor may reverse the decision. In the meantime I just wanted to get some insight on what this entails. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. Awaiting Reviewer Selection If the editor feels that your manuscript has the potential to be published, but requires changes, you’ll be invited to revise it. Acceptance decisions are made by an academic editor (the Editor-in-Chief, a Guest Editor/Topic Editor/Collection Editor, or another suitable Editorial Board member). Apr 24, 2018 · TIP: manuscript rejections can be appealed. After a month in peer review, i received comments of FIVE reviewers with a message from the academic editor that it needed a Major revision as • Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. The status date Each paper is assigned a unique identifier of the form IT-YY-NNNN[. The AE will now go through your manuscript to know what it’s about and whether the study is interesting, novel, and relevant enough to be published with the journal and therefore to be sent for peer review. I suppose that in most cases (of minor revision), the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. 18 As a rule of thumb, minor revision leads to a quick acceptance, usually without sending the paper back to reviewers; however, this depends on how well the editor does his/her job and Jun 27, 2015 · It's waiting for the editor to read the reviews and make a decision. Jun 9, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Sep 17, 2020 · The peer-review process can appear intimidating and complex. See Box 1 for successful strategies and Box 2 for helpful resources. Minor review with only two small changes came. So we sent query to the editor. I sent two emails to the "handling editor" asking if there is any problem with my paper but no reply. After evaluation, the Academic Editor chooses between the following decisions: Accept Minor Revision Major Revision Reject Revisions - Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Revision have 45 days to resubmit the revised manuscript. Apr 30, 2020 · This status is most probably similar to ‘With Editor,’ which itself can mean any of a few things: it’s with the associate editor (AE) after submission, it’s with the AE after the peer review, or it’s with the AE after revision and resubmission, which is perhaps the case here. With May 3, 2018 · One of my paper is stuck after minor revision submitted on 31/05/2019 and current status is "under review" for more than 6 months. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. If needed, you can still make changes to your report after it has been submitted, up until the Interactive Review Forum is activated by the associate editor. The majority of articles require revision before reaching this stage. One of the reviewers also suggested revising for additional data. Depending on the journal, the assignment may be done by technical staff, the journal's chief editor, or automatic by submission category or author suggestion. The status “With editor” implies that your manuscript has not been sent for peer review yet and the editor is looking for potential reviewers. If the initial revision was a minor revision, the status usually changes to ‘With Editor’ or ‘Decision in Progress’. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. This letter usually contains information on how to return your revised manuscript including instructions on how to highlight the changes made and when you need to return the revised According to editor guideline on springer website "Accept with minor revisions is actually a commitment to ultimately publish the paper, provided the authors answer the remaining concerns (which should be relatively minor) in a timely and proper way. Contact Editors can be assigned as Handling Editors by the Managing Editor. ' What does this mean? Apr 30, 2020 · I assume the two status updates you have mentioned are those after you submitted the paper following the major revision request. Authors have a maximum of 3 months to submit their major revisions. This means it’s going to be a second round of revision. But do not wait until the last minute to finish the revision. Any decision above 'major revision' is good, meaning you get a chance to improve the paper and hopefully get to full the Editor who decides whether it is suitable for sending out for peer review. This, even though on the susy website under editor deciison there might be an “accept as it is” message. Answer: After two revisions (the first major and the second minor), the Editor Assigned status means that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE) to review the second round of changes and also the manuscript as a whole. Apr 8, 2016 · Recently, I have received a major revision decision for my paper. Then it will take probably one month to get your work accepted. If so, the status change means that the associate editor (AE) has gone through the revised manuscript and made a decision on the paper. What does this mean? When a manuscript is first received, the Editor-in-Chief, Scientific Editor, or their designated editor will decide whether the manuscript meets the formal criteria specified in the Instructions for Authors and whether it fits within the scope of the journal. After 1 week later the paper status has changed to "under review" and then after two weeks later the paper status has changed to "with editor". If the initial revision was a major revision, there may be another round of major/minor revision requested on resubmission. Our goal is to help you maximize journal impact and make journals the best they can be. Now, again it Request a minor revision, where authors revise their manuscript to address specific concerns Request a major revision, where authors revise their manuscript to address significant concerns and Aug 5, 2020 · :-) ‘Reviewer Assigned’ means that the journal has had a look at your manuscript and decided to send it for peer review, whether internal or external. Dec 22, 2015 · The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". I sent 2 emails in the last 2 months asking about the update of the revised version. On December 22, the status changed to Under Review, and has remained so since then. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to The reviewers will come up with comments and ultimately the editor may approve, reject, , or more commonly ask for revision (major/minor). Editor assignment or invitation. This post will walk you through the peer-review process, show you how reviewers are […] Mar 13, 2024 · The journal's Editorial team will check the submission and either send back to the author for action, or assign to an Editor. Mar 13, 2022 · Minor revision: The paper is almost accepted. One day later, the status changed as "editor assigned". Even if the revision is minor, I strongly recommend that you do an excellent and Editor Decision. This means that the peer review of the second revision is over, and now, the handling editor – either the Associate Editor (AE) or the Managing Editor (ME), as the case may be – is trying to decide on your manuscript, or at least they have been assigned to do so. September 15: I received a major revision decision. After submitting the minor revision, the statutes changed to the pending editorial decision for 1 month. However, it is an essential element of scientific publishing, ensuring that a manuscript is relevant and suitable for publication and upholding scientific integrity. With Jul 28, 2016 · The status "Editor Assigned" means that your paper has been assigned to an Associate Editor (AE) who will be in charge of it. The journal clearly said that the paper was accepted, subject to minor amendments and even went on to mention tentative publication dates. However, even if the deadline is 3 months later, the authors should try to resubmit the revised manuscript at the earliest possible date . Major revision: The paper could be accepted after some significant changes. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. The journal's Editorial team will check the submission and either send back to the author for action, or assign to an Editor. The reason with it is now Editor Assigned can be due to several reasons. Reviewers are given 3 weeks to review the major revision. comments may be sent to the associate editor. Today the status suddenly changed from under review (being one month in this status) to editor assigned again! . After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. If none of the relevant academic editors agree to handle your submission, we will unfortunately have no option but to return it to you. Acceptance decisions on manuscripts can be made by the academic editor after peer review once a minimum of two review reports have been received. ‘Editor Assigned’ means that an Associate Editor (AE) has been assigned to your manuscript. Minor revisions (You are able to check the revisions; suggest using rarely after the initial round of peer review) Major revisions (May require re-review from the original reviewers; this should be used in the vast majority of cases after the initial round of peer review) Reject after review; Please provide a short rationale for your decision. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Once the AE has completed their review, they will make their decision on the manuscript Sep 16, 2021 · Footnote 18 As a rule of thumb, minor revision leads to a quick acceptance, usually without sending the paper back to reviewers; however, this depends on how well the editor does his/her job and sometimes on whether his/her expertise is relevant to your paper. Now, again it May 3, 2019 · After several weeks I received an email saying that"Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be accepted for publication should you be prepared to incorporate minor revisions". The status date Feb 4, 2021 · So, your re-revised manuscript has moved to Editor Assigned after Under Review. But sometimes the reviewers do not return to the Editor within the time Nov 30, 2016 · After one round of minor revision, my submission has now reached the "Awaiting EIC decision" stage. ” Manuscripts submitted following revision decisions require an editor’s judgment about the suitability of the response to review (i. If AE would like to recommend for a minor revision when a manuscript still has a major Aug 25, 2021 · I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript. When in doubt, the editor will consult other members of the Editorial Board. R2 for the second Jan 17, 2023 · accept aft. This is to ensure the quality, originality and accuracy of the work submitted to the journals. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. You’ll have 45 days to resubmit the revised manuscript for both a major or a minor revision. Nov 9, 2020 · I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. It all depends on the discipline and journal process: though there are other factors. Status shows "Revision submitted to journal". Comments: In my opinion, the manuscript can be accepted after minor revision. Jan 1, 2023 · I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Decision Date: 14 April 2023 Then they sent it to the third review (with no required revision from us) on 20 May 2023. Resubmit after major revision. g. Jul 1, 2018 · Eventually, the manuscript will be accepted or rejected. Apr 13, 2018 · In the 2nd revision, I could not understand the editorial manager paper status meaning. Step 5: Final Decision After one round of revision and resubmission, the primary editor typically makes a final publication decision. Feb 16, 2021 · Also, as this is the third revision, we assume the latest is a minor revision. The status was "With Editor" for one day, then on the next it changed to "reviewers assigned". It all depends on the editor to adjudge the comments base on the merit of the paper. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". Throughout the whole revision process, authors should bear in mind that even a minor revision does not guarantee acceptance after revision. Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. What does it mean for a submitted revision to have a status "Editor Assigned"? Sep 23, 2015 · Is it common for a journal to reject a paper after previously accepting it? When a paper of mine was first reviewed, one of the reviewers was okay with the paper and the other one requested minor revisions. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript is now "awaiting reviewer selection". Jul 8, 2015 · I submitted an article to springer. Jul 29, 2017 · Accept with minor revision. Minor Revision - The minor revision should not go back to the reviewers. ' Now, after three weeks, the status date of the manuscript has changed, but the status remains 'Reviewers Assigned. Minor revision: The manuscript is likely to be acceptable for publication after revision, commonly without further review. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. Jan 19, 2021 · After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Possible reasons for the need of a new reviewer could be that the initial reviewer is busy with some other personal or professional commitment and has stepped back from the review. , R1) depending on whether the revision is minor or not. Through a letter to the editor, I sent the updated manuscript addressing all the comments raised by the reviewers. The first time I submitted it, they just assigned an editor. It has been over two months, but the status is still displayed as Mar 14, 2018 · The most common editor decisions are “accept,” “minor revision,” “major revision,” and “reject. Nov 20, 2023 · The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Aug 12, 2019 · Answer: It is not uncommon for a journal to invite new reviewers after a manuscript has been submitted with minor revisions. Only a few minor changes or clarifications are needed. The five allowable Editorial decisions are: 2. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Do editor-in-chiefs usually follow the recommendations of the associate editor below them who managed the review process? When to decide on ‘minor revisions’ As a manuscript author, receiving ‘minor revisions’ is a huge reason to celebrate. The professional editor and Academic Editor will promptly assess the manuscript and will decide if it is likely to meet the requirement of providing a major advance in a particular field and describing a sufficient body of work to support that claim; if so, you’ll be invited to submit Apr 30, 2024 · In Editorial Manager, the Handling Editor is the person to whom a review is currently assigned, and who is responsible for the current stage of the editorial process. However, the change of status from “Editor Assigned” to “Editor Invited” indicates that the assigned editor has declined the request to handle your paper. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. In most cases, the revised manuscript is re-assigned to the original Academic Editor. The IGI global submission platform indicated that my manuscript is in the following phase: Revision Received 11/4/2018 Nov 20, 2023 · The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose Minor Revision. In general, a paper is recommended for minor revision when all reviews are either accept or minor revision. After 5 months I received a "Major revision". The editor once again provides feedback to authors and renders a publication decision. This depends a lot on the manuscript management system, and the editorial practices. There are several Sep 4, 2020 · Once the reviews are received, the Associate Editor decides what happens next; although reviewers are asked to suggest whether the manuscript should be accepted, rejected, or revised, the final decision rests with the Associate Editor. Based on the recommendations of the reviewers, the assigned Associate Editor issues one of the following decisions, which are generally described by the following: Publish as is: The manuscript can be published immediately. July 1: I made the initial submission. The manuscript is publishable in its current form. , I decide to accept the manuscript, request additional revisions or experiments, send the Jan 1, 2013 · Usually, you have 2-3 weeks to submit the revision. Apr 15, 2021 · An editor can overrule a reviewer. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. ” The assigned editor can now take a call on whether to send your manuscript for peer review. What does this mean? Why is it taking so much time? All reviewers recommend “Accept with no (further) revision”. Based on the topic of the manuscript and suggestions by the authors, an editor is assigned to handle the manuscript. After an article is submitted to a journal, a journal editor screens the manuscript and decides whether or not to send it for full peer review. However, since then we did not receive any feedback from the journal editors. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. What I have heard was that minor revision does not require another round of revision in most of the cases. On December 20, I submitted the revised article. Minor Revision - A limited number of changes are required. What I have heard was that minor revision does not require another round of revision in most of the Nov 20, 2023 · The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Implies that the editors and reviewers feel the paper is publishable once their comments have been addressed. In this case, does it mean that the paper is sent back to referees again? Oct 6, 2021 · After one week, I submitted my revised manuscript, responding to all reviewers’ comments. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Jul 10, 2016 · The first mission of the editor is to assign reviewers and take a decision depending on their return. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. The vast majority of minor revisions are ultimately accepted for publication, while many more major revisions are later found unacceptable and rejected. Sep 27, 2019 · On the other hand, if the status changes to “Decision in process,” it implies that the Editor is making the decision on your paper. I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. One month later, major revision was suggested. I had submitted a manuscript in March 2019. Jan 10, 2023 · When the authors receive a decision of major revision or minor revision, the authors are usually allowed to have 1 week to 3 months for the revision, which varies widely among journals. Any ideas what should I expect now? You will usually receive a letter from the editor who handled your manuscript outlining the changes they would like you to make and links to the reviewer reports. The Action Editor (i. The two reviewers’ feedback were uploaded on 2 June 2023. This is exactly the same with my case. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. It means that you are getting close to the final stages of the manuscript publication process! Thus, evaluating a manuscript of someone else and deciding on ‘minor revisions’ requires careful consideration. One file per question can be submitted. The flip side of this is that the editor will of course try to get the same referee to do the revisions, and the referee might have become busier in the meantime. The author is informed by the Editor Each new submission is assigned to a primary editor, who reads the paper, consults with the other editors, and then evaluates the novelty and potential impact of the work, the appropriateness for 決定には「rejection(掲載お断り)」、「minor revision」、「major revision」そして「accept(受理)」の4種類があります。Minor revisionは少し訂正が必要であるという意味で、たいていの場合は論文を手直しした後に「accept」されます。Major revisionは訂正が多く、雑誌 Jun 19, 2020 · Now, after a month, the status has changed to ‘Required Reviews Completed,’ which as the term suggests, means that the peer review has been completed. 1 The next immediate step after peer review, if the authors are lucky enough, is to revise the manuscript according to editors’ and reviewers’ comments. Before contacting the editor, you might want to consider the following Each initial submission is assigned to a PLOS Medicine staff editor for an assessment of scope and quality. (2) Accept after minor revision (no further review): At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no The editor gave acceptance with minor revision before last reply but after the follow up with journal manager my case was referred to Editor-in-Chief who rejected it with an objection that it Jun 25, 2022 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed Springer journal.
wowrirr
ejkbhsa
ycaftz
touq
twov
anvers
rfkmm
ellddz
rqd
tplr