H 264 lossless vs h264 reddit

So you should research that. I currently export videos in QuickTime container which allows me to use H. 264 streams. And you'd probably be recording at 100mbps or more. Efficiency (File size vs. I've tried this with a customer. And the quality is pretty much identical. I know from work our LTS DVRs make . 264 YouTube render settings if you need tips on that. • 1 mo. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. It's still incredibly fast either way, and the difference is so small that it makes more sense to pick the format based on what you intend to use it for rather than speed. 264 is meant to be about twice the file size, I then tried the Seems like you need to use a better media player, something like MPV. 265 is new enough that only the higher-end hardware (3rd gen Fire TV, Roku Ultra, nVidia Shield) have h. Still can't wait for AOM to produce an open-source and royalty-free codec. Also, the working group has members of Nvidia, Intel, AMD, ARM and Plex Dash says the same transcoding info. please note, H. 264 is not a great editing codec. mkv a compression format / container? H. H264 is slower but better quality and smaller file sizes. With the use of H. 264, but with a file size saving of 30-40%. Unfortunately, from experience most surveillance DVRs record in a proprietary h264 codec. 264 or (even better) H. 265/HEVC "proxy", optionally with timecode burned in. In how much of a bad spot am I? Processor transcoding isn't an option either, it's weak. Currently H. 264 (AVCHD) YUV 4:4:4, Lossless and 4:2:0 ? I bought a cheapo $15 GTX 650 to Passthrough to my Plex in Unraid, but I just noticed that it can only encode H. The difference is that the h265 codec will encode more information on the same size. TV shows, live action stuff, sitcoms. 264 if the bitrates are the identical, as h. Use the slowest preset you can stand. At 84 and 65 mbit, the VMAF scores of the videos from YT are practically identical 91. 265 capability built in. I'm not impressed so far with the 265 on the 1-inch vs the 264 but just a few tests so far. A full resolution and high quality (but still fairly compressed) version in H. The only downside to consider is encoding/decoding h. 264, but awful in VC-1. It also works on consoles. 264 -crf 0 and -qp 0 both make lossless videos, but for making lossless h. 2. sorry but isnt h. quality when adjusted for file size should be the same as they both use the h264 codec, though the 10gb file will obviously have better quality overall than the 4gb one. 265 encoder Topaz has bundled to achieve a good quality/size ratio. convert h265 mkv to h264 mp4. 264 with equivalent quality as ProRes or other intermediate codecs is easy. 264, resulting in files of comparable video quality that are about half the size. [deleted] • 3 yr. 265 to h. I can do that with compressor fairly easily but naturally, apple Share. I understand the differences between encoding, decoding and transcoding. mkv This command will take your lossless avi file, and push out a lossless MKV file that's a bit smaller. 35. So, question is, is encoding directly with x265 possible The H. 8 GB h264 movie is pretty pointless, quality can only get worse. How does NVENC losslessly encode smaller than x264? What am I doing wrong? ffv1 vs "h264 -crf 0". Otherwise H. Lossless is not actually supported with NVENC AV1 so it will instead default to record with P5 and CQP 20. A full quality version in a common high quality codec like ProRes 422 HQ. 264 does have a lossless mode. The idea being that these differences is very low so this The hardware encoders are targeted at real-time encoding like video streaming where high bitrates or low quality are more acceptable. That would not be lossless aka 'untouched', would it then? At a 10k view - h. A 4-year-old Roku 3 or even a 1st gen Chromecast, for example, have chips that can natively decode h. 264 video that YouTube will play with. But whan FFV1 does that H. ProRes Vs. Also maintained by the same organization as H264 (ITU-T), added features like a deblocking filter (where the "blockiness" due to compression losses could be reduced), larger resolutions, etc. Lossless is lossless. mkv -c:v libx264 -crf 0 -c:a copy 264. 265 much faster than x264/x265 (which use the CPU) could encode into H. e. It only has to decode the VC-1, which that CPU can do in its sleep (in hardware or software). x265 is a head and neck better than x264 in terms of quality and compression size. In my experience lossless almost always creates a file larger than the source in a conversion scenario. 264 is only worth encoding if you need it quickly or the device (s) you're using don't support newer codecs like H. ) we've come a long way with compression formats like HEVC, AV1, h265, compared to h264 we had before. Even then, it'd be a toss up as lossless as HEVC would still net you H. 264 Blu-ray" export options are similar, Blu-ray authoring requires 3 individual files to be written to disc (video, audio, and chapter markers), so the "H. 264 files. Few or none of these devices will or can be upgraded to play Ogg content since a lot of them have relatively weak CPUs and use hardware decoders for video. 264 is Magic. It's those settings or nothing. So much better. What's the difference between H. blu ray discs already come in h264 some also use VC-1. H265 file is 41 MB. But the bitrate of the H265 NVEnc video is lower than the 264 one. This is a big advantage especially when it comes to storing and Phryxus. 264 On my 2017 iMac h264 is still much faster to encode than h265, so I use it for most things. Basically use crf, set Level 5 to get hardware compatible bitrate control, use a 4 second GOP, disable open GOP, and disable SAO since it blurs a bit and is only a good idea at lower bitrates. 265. 264 is interframe, meaning it stores the data Is it worth choosing over regular x264. 265 video files don’t take up as much storage space, and they require less bandwidth to stream. There is not a studio on the planet who spends money to scan an old film and then store the result using lossy compression. 264, bit rate savings of 50% or more compared to MPEG-2 Part 2 are reported. 265 (HEVC) is definitively better than h. This means a 10-bit image can display up to 1. 2 (4096x2304) here's my current command. h264 is a variable size codec. The same will be with the hardware encoder. YouTube have their recommend bitrates for h. x264; NVENC is for throwaway encodes, like live streaming. 264 is one of the worst codecs you can edit. Click “Convert” icon on the bottom right think JPEG (lossy) vs Bitmap (lossless), or in audio, mp3 vs wav. 70ms latency is very playable for a lot of games, but can be an issue with others. Just export from Premiere using high quality h264 and customize the bitrate to be 2 pass and a higher bitrate if you want. But if you’re working with large amounts of footage it can be almost unusable even on a high end system. No idea if the Arc supports lossless AV1 either. Share. Encoder Features Constrained Baseline Profile up to Level 5. 265 is a more efficient codec - better quality to filesize ratio. They simply didn't mean the same things. It must decode every frame fully. It transcodes them in real time into it's own flavour of mpeg codec for editing. Codecs designed for editing (DNx, Pro Res, Cineform) will performance WILDLY better than h. But The second is somewhat false, but in a really really good way. " I had an older version of Openshot's before and had not used it for a I want something along the lines of "Play Version: 12. In addition, an 8-bit file works with RGB using 256 levels per channel, while 10-bit jumps up to 1,024 levels per channel. When I look at the codec information in VLC Player for both videos, the data is identical. 264, Constant Quality, RF: 0, H. If you don’t edit it or don’t need compatibility av1 is better, as less space is used for the same quality. I used the youtube editor to trim something at the end for both videos but I don't think it affects quality as it re-encodes the original file. AV1 and Lossless at the same time, now that's funny. h. 100mbps would be plenty for 4k60 in h. So. 265 needs less bitrate to achieve the same perceived quality, resulting in a smaller file size. However, its encoding time is higher too. 265 is more intensive, so if your device does not support hardware As the google suggested: " H. 264 Profile: auto. Alright heres a weird one. 3. X265. So for me and all the people we work with and for, it's never used. Discussion. h264 files, but they have some deal with proprietary data attached. I wouldn't be surprised if most if not all Blu-ray authoring Apr 17, 2023 · Click Format button to select format with H264 codec that you want, such as MP4, MKV, MOV, etc. 264 and HEVC, the QP value is really a logarithmic progression that maps to the "real" QP that's used to quantize; each 6 steps doubles the quantization. it's doesn't matter if you have powerfull CPU/GPU. AOM is a working group that is planning to produce a royalty-free, non-patented video codec named AV1 by March 2017. 264 out of Resolve - I've put information in the Wiki or an old FAQ Friday about ideal H. For alpha graphics etc, we use lossless codecs. Encoding time will depend a lot on what you're encoding. For audio go to audio tab on right, set it to multi instead of stereo/mono and it should extract all tracks. 265 processes information using coding tree units (CTUs). h264 is a codec. In most cases, yes, HEVC is definitely worth choosing over x264, especially if you have the disk space for lossless or near-lossless recording. 265 is mainly used for TV and high quality streaming distribution. It will encode it into h264 with quick sync. As others noted, H. the lossless preset and tune make it larger than the original file. ProRes has five set compression sizes in the family. VC-1 QP was the more traditional one, and the actual value used to quantize. My camera natively records in h264. You cannot mix it into a MP4 or MKV as suggested, because the video stream is still proprietarty and it will fail to play. Something like 95% of video files are x264 and have much better direct play support. AVC is another name for H. At low bitrates, 20 and 9mbit, AV1 does give you better quality. H263 - The predecessor to H264 and designed in the mid 90s. To be specific I'm talking about the setting in Output > Recording > Encoder Settings > Rate Control. 1. Is it worth choosing over regular x264. 07 billion colors X264. So basically if you are storage poor and just need to save space, use x265. I have videos saved as ~700 (24bit) pngs, and even though pngcrush saves around 50% disc space, i think there has to be a better way. I know that I can output to lossless first and then encode with x265, but I rather not trash my HDDs with numerous multi-gigabyte encodes on a regular basis. 265/HEVC? ffmpeg -i input. You can remux the video from a blu-ray for a 1:1 "lossless" rip (lossless from the disk, not that the codec used is lossless necessarily). Standardization is important to allow interoperability. They (ProRes/DNX) are defined as lossless codecs and are superior to H264 for archiving. 264. 264 so the Plex server doesn't have to transcode it first. Mar 23, 2023 · FFmpeg Command Example. But how come the FFV1 codec is lossless? First of all, as a lot will say, h. 264 video format has a very broad application range that covers all forms of digital compressed video from low bit-rate Internet streaming applications to HDTV broadcast and Digital Cinema applications with nearly lossless coding. AVC, MPEG2, MPEG4, H. 4 to 92. mkv. About Lossless H. Not even the AMF useless h264 encoder is that bad. Unless you intend to make it worse, meaning the real goal is a smaller file. 264 file should be about double what the bitrate of an h. it only utilizes lossless compression, which hasn't come very far since H. 264 in the timeline and on export. CTUs process information more efficiently, which results in a smaller file size and less bandwidth used for your streamed video. 264/AAC works on hundreds of millions of cell phones and PMPs not to mention desktops. For SD content like dvds, h264 is probably the way to go. To generate lossless H. AV1 is not a magic bullet to get better quality on YT. 264, just as HEVC is another name for H. 264 on the other hand is more widespread and is one of the standard codecs for video content on the Internet. But that command is pointless and is probably not what you want, because the bitrate (and the resulting file size) will be SUPER high. If you let Resolve pick the bitrate, then H265 should be around 50% smaller. Add a Comment. 264 (AVCHD) YUV 4:2:0. When I export H. Help There is true lossless 24 bit (RGB), "lossless" 12 bit (NV12), visual lossless (H264/H265 high bitrate), VP9 medium bitrate, AVC1 low bitrate. Hi, I'm converting some 1080p 60fps h. By logic I was thinking it would be the most…. yeah I think I will use Prores for youtube mostly. *For editing, Quicktime ProRes 422/444 HQ ist recommended. General-Oven-1523. This needs to be copied (transcoded) into an mp4 container. Keep in mind that this is a lossy process, and quality loss is inevitable during the conversion. Losslessly re-encoding from H. 265 is way more efficient than H. its easy on your processor and faster to edit, especially with effects on top. Everything will support h264 and most modern clients support h265/hevc. 265 or AV1 will give you significantly smaller files at the same quality. 264 at 200mbps can get you into the low 40s. You're hopefully using PR 422 (or HQ) for mastering. 264 employs all those techniques, so I would say that's a better baseline to compare to. From 88 VMF to 92 VMF is a small difference, one that I'm willing to take. 264 and H. Even then, it'd be a toss up as lossless as HEVC would still net you While the "H. Hey Guys, i know the basics of video quality, i need to look for Use h264 or h265 (nvenc) for recording if you want to edit your files afterwards and want the most compatibility with different software. 7 Mbps, 1080p H. For example, QP 20 looked pretty good in H. 264 encode. Because ffmpeg uses libx264, it can push out completely lossless h. Set CQ to 0 for lossless. 265 video with these encoding settings: Format : HEVC Format/Info : High Efficiency Video Coding Format profile : Format Range@L4@Main…. 265 (High Efficiency Video Codec or HEVC) are the video codec standards; x264 and x265 are software encoders that create files that conform to those respective standards. 264 for editing fine!" Both are true. Either way - Re-encoding a 1. Reply. Uploading a 700 mbit DNxHR is really the only significant difference at 95. I know that QuickTime Lossless is the only way to preserve the original colors used however the files are huge and there is almost no use case for it. 264 or H. 265 will deliver the same quality as h. For YouTube I can recommend using CQ. ; Step 6 Batch convert HEVC to H264. 265 very well. To achieve the highest quality and compression time, never use I’ll admit, the quality difference between that and H264 isn’t huge. Step 5 Edit the file parameter (optional) Then, click the gear icon next to the format to edit video and audio parameters, such as quality, resolution, frame rate, etc. No. Also for that end goal AV1 will be better, just lacks some mainstream support rn (will be remedied in months though). mp4. 264 is super processor intensive. It all depends on what clients you use. However, my guess is that he is converting to h. Its incredibly CPU intensive for a CPU to decode in a video editor. The difference being in the parameters used, prediction algorithm, exact processes, etc which are things they have tested to be better for lossless video compression. SVT-AV1 in some cases is as good as AOM-AV1, and in others it's a night and day difference. If you use a static bitrate, then both files are supposed to be nearly identical in size. Use h264 or h265 (nvenc) for recording if you want to edit your files afterwards and want the most compatibility with different software. Look for high bitrate on action movies/series, for shows like Friends where they mostly sit still and talk, it's redundant. mp4 -c:v libx265 -crf 16 -c:a copy h265output. That's because H. Also 265 seems locked at 75 megabits, but I've noticed 264 5. 1 Mbps, 1080p HEVC; 34. For reference I'm using You'll get better quality by uploading h. Premiere doesn't edit the h. These files will survive being recompressed to ProRes 20+ generations. Having h. •. From my experience i can record a video at HEVC CQP 18, transcode it few times, upload to youtube (VP9) and still there will be no visual artifatcs or blur. DaVinci Resolve Lossless Audio Export in MP4 container. 264 to H. Reply reply Whenever I export to H264 using a M1 Mac the video will always have random green bars, frame skips, and just little glitches throughout the video. Usually on the client there is a spot to see playback details, which will tell you the reason for transcoding. Also, something else about it is that Windows 7 Explorer won't generate a thumbnail for it whereas it will if I do a direct-stream copy between keyframes. I tried -cq 1 and -cq 51 for NVENC as well to see that -cq affects quality (it does), and that -cq 0 is lossless (I checked that both 0 and 1 are visually lossless). (Left) Lossless, (Right) h264. Most h. 264's lossless mode is NOT compatible on every device or can't be hardware decoded in every device. If you have more than a couple users, you will notice much more transcoding. 264 for some kinda device compatibility. I tried the trial version, and I'm apprehensive of whatever H. SVT-AV1 is almost on par with Intel AV1 hardware encoder. ffmpeg -i 265. • 9 mo. i have tried -rc vbr, -cq 0) and manually setting bit-rate with -b:v 3 but the wiki says its not recommended. 264 and 21-23 when using H. if you have time, try check quality by using VMAF. 264 and Linear PCM. Mpeg2 has another big advantage. By default H264 and h265 are defined as lossy codecs because they are designed to compress and throw away information to make them smaller to help streaming and playback. sh file and it will run on some . 265 creates problems for live streaming. mp4`. Uploading ProRes to your Vimeo account is a waste of bandwidth and your monthly upload limits. Though this file is not supported natively by Apple, it can be re-encoded as near-lossless for playback. Blurays straight copy of the videostream means you have NO degradation compared to physical disc but it takes much more space. I screwed up my DVR and recorded too much before and after some tv episodes and want to cut the first and last 5 minutes off of about 20 videos. x265 is not lossless, though better compression than h. 265 will get better quality at the same bitrate, but it's also less widely supported. Final studio masters are stored in lossless form - compressed or uncompressed depending on requirements. I have a H. You can encode 10bit h. 265 codec compresses information more efficiently than H. For those videos that I don't care about the quality…. 264 lossless by using software capable of encoding in constant quantize parameter mode (QP) with a QP value of 0. I want to convert a handful of videos from h265 to h264 in an mp4 container. ADMIN. Ah, gotcha. 264 for quality per size. (For 8bit lossless, you instead use -crf 0 - but ProRes 422 is 10bit. I would set CQ at 17 when using H. Losslesss took 30+ hours to both upload and process hd. 264 . In H. ffmpeg -hwaccel cuda -hwaccel_output_format cuda -i inut. The versions are difficult to tell apart visually because I compressed to HEVC using Handbrake's veryslow setting with 10-bit color and 18 CRF, for The video will be substantially larger and it won't be any better than the original. x264 is the best implementation. avi -c:v libx264 -preset veryslow -qp 0 -c:a flac output_video. 174K subscribers in the obs community. h264 took 10-15 minutes for both. ffmpeg -i input_video. I tried processing it at the same bitrate as the original and the file size was only a little bigger which didn't seem right as h. 26x. A 100mbps video 10 seconds long will be 125MB regardless if it's h265 or 264. A lot will also say "Premiere handles h. 264 render, I'd stick with ProRes/DNxHR, and then use Shutter Encoder to convert to H. I would like to export H. It's fairly quick, but it generates a very large file size. x264 is an encoder. For example, any 1080p over 20 mbps is crunched down to H264 accordingly per their specs. Just depends on your priorities. The size of AMD VCE encodes are much higher than X264 but it's so much faster than X264 if you prefer a little bid of compression (2GB to 800MB) at 720P it's a good choice but if you want to Compress as much as We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Just queue the files up and let them run overnight. To answer your question: encoding lossy video losslessly It's only a solution to live streaming because H. If you're set on H. 265 or aren't satisfied with Resolve's H. 264/H. 264 encoder usually results in a lossy file which the decoder can't return to original state, because of losses during the encoding process. NVENC is far less efficient than a CPU encoder, which means the filesize will be bigger at the same quality compared to CPU encoding. h264 files) neither a codec (like x264). 265 seems to have odd frame groupings like 12 frame and the first frame is super defined then the other 11 are low bitrate. 264 processes frames of video using macroblocks, while H. An example of a command for converting H. Something else to keep in mind is that the audio side of h264 is often noticeably poor. If sticking with H264, No need to put it though handbrake. VMAF) Performance #1 (FPS vs VMAF) Performance #2 (FPS vs File size) Note that for the sake of brevity I've slightly abused terminology in the charts - even though AOMEnc doesn't call it a preset, aom_p4_1p just means a single pass AOMEnc encoding at --cpu-usage 4, etc. 265 file is. You don't set a bitrate for lossless, you let the encoder use as much as is necessary. Agreed, p7 or slow are the way to go for maximum quality and highest compression. 264, I've heard the bitrate or an h. To try running this on a set of test movies, activate the run_compression_on_test_movies. Values higher than 0 aren’t technically lossless, but using values between 16 and 18 should give you visually identical image, comparing to your master file. will result in larger files) than x264 lossless. "Best" might be subjective, but h. 264 are not capable of doing this. Nov 17, 2021 · The H. 265/HEVC are standards while x264 and x265 are software tools. 264 rather than simply encoding to H. The same timeline, exported in Quicktime, is fine so its definitely a H. 264" or (/ideally also) a way to add custom descriptive text such as "Lossless" beside the H. I. H. On my 2017 iMac h264 is still much faster to encode than h265, so I use it for most things. 264 is a video compression standard, it's not a format (you don't have . This gives your customer the convenience of reviewing the "proxy" of your content on a wide range of software players H. What I don't understand is why we get a better result by encoding the "raw" project file into a high quality format like pro res and then transcoding to H. It’s not really a quality issue. The caveat would be if you have a large multi-core processor (Threadripper, 3950x, etc. The downside is that you can’t see bitrate or file size before encoding. (edit: this is also better for conservation purposes. 264 (Advanced Video Codec or AVC) and H. 264, in other words, H. 265 using FFmpeg is provided by a Reddit user: `ffmpeg -i h264Input. 264 ones, what should I use? How do I determine which of them should I use depending on the input? We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. For DVD's I'd still use AV1 once Plex supports the standard. 264 with HandBrake GUI, set Video Codec: H. 3k 24fps is 100megabits whereas 1080 Results. 26. no. 264 is meant for distribution and ProRes is meant for mastering. tqmirza. In general, h. So, I’d do something like this. 264 in mp4 container with audio encoded as Linear PCM. 264 from the highest quality - the raw project itself. 264 mp4 videos, the only available codec for audio is AAC (I'm on Windows 10). ago. I just did a 20-second render test: H264 file is 101 MB. EDIT: I found the answer. 264 Blu-ray" export format delivers that, which makes it more suitable for the Blu-ray creation process. 265 are, by definition, lossy compression methods, I believe. If you want the 'highest quality' you're better off uploading an H264 between 18 and 20 mbps and it'll look razor close to Blu-Ray quality (about 22 mbps). Motion estimation/prediction work just as well in lossless compression as lossy compression, and I imagine, for most videos, inter-frame motion prediction + DEFLATE (or a more recent compression algorithm like LZMA) on the residue, 4-5:1 should be achievable. meaning, the x264 release is an encode (probably from a blu ray) and the h264 one is a webdl (from itunes, netflix, amazon or whatever). I've been recording a lot of videos the past few months. It shouldn’t be an issue to let Plex transcode. VD AV1 10 bit at 200mbps at Godlike is around 50ms or so. around 50GB for an hour of video (at least for 4:2:0 subsampling), and x265 lossless is less efficient (i. 264/AVC and H. So you can have a higher quality file at the same size or a smaller file at the same quality (or a mix). The benefits of this are twofold: H. 264/AVC to H. if you have a modern NVIDIA GPU you can use NVENC (a system of GPU encoding hardware/software) to encode into H. If you DO have a Plex Pass then go into your server settings and enable hardware transcoding. Your computer has to look ahead and behind to create full frames, and it's often harder for computers to process. -c:v libx265 -crf 18 -tune film -x265-params keyint=96:level=5:no-open-gop=1:sao=0. 265 at 200ms will get you into the mid 40s, maybe spiking into the 50s on occasion. x265 need more processing than x264. In my situation, I usually see this behaviour on iOS devices for videos with an mkv container. I would suggest you increase them by 50%, as the recommended ones are a bit low. 265 vs h. You can render an H. VP10, Daala and Thor were all donated to AOM to help with the creation. mkv -b_ref_mode 0 -c:v hevc_nvenc -cq 1 -preset p7 -tune hq -c:a copy outputp. etc). Resulting from actually removing certain data from the image through DCT, chroma subsampling and prediction etc. 264 has a more varied spectrum of implementations because it is the most used video codec worldwide, thanks to YouTube. 264 thing. If you want to convert losslessly, you can use -crf 0 . Does anyone know of a workaround for this? I've tried disabling hardware encoding, but its the same thing. Lossless is big because it’s H264 is the standard. You can upload it just fine to places like YouTube though! . 264 does not do is it encodes the difference between the predicted image and the actual image. H265 yes. The NVENC command has -cq 0 (equal to lossless) while x264 has -crf 0 (also equal to lossless). 264 Hey guys, this is my first post and it’s something I’m struggling with for a long time now and didn’t find a solid answer for in the world wide interwebs yet. It has mainly a better compression and a higher maximum frame size. mp4 -c:v libx265 -x265-params "lossless=1" -c:a copy output. Would encoding from the MP4 file create a noticible loss in quality? My PC has an Intel 12600K CPU and an Nvidia 3080 GPU. 265 are delivery/streaming codecs designed to be tiny file sizes; instead of full frames per frame, they're "GOPs" or "Groups Of Pictures" that only contain what changed from the last "Key" frame. For x265 and SVT-AV1 hopefully no confusion can H265 hasn't been embraced and you'll find many devices that play h264 won't play h265. X264 is an implantation of that standard by VideoLAN; the company that makes VLC. MKV is a container which can hold streams in different codecs and can be played directly in a video player. 264 has been around long enough for hardware decoders to be commonplace. I don't have much experience with x265 lossless, but I know 2 things: x264 lossless at 1080p is somewhere around 100-120Mbps, i. 264 has so definitely preferable for storage. 07 billion colors handbrake supports H. ) You'll also need to use the High422 profile to maintain the bit depth and colour space of ProRes 422. 264" and "H. (its a video after all, so consecutive frames should compress better) I found the ffv1 codec whitch produces ~1,2 gbyte, while h264 -crf 0 gets me a 0,8 gbyte file. 264 here. ol eq wr ku su dj sw hc ak aw